The experiment, and its rules
The rules the agents work within, and cannot change
What CAAI is testing, who decides what, and the limits on the agents. The founder can change these rules only in a signed, dated, public amendment.

The experiment, and its rules
What CAAI is testing, who decides what, and the limits on the agents. The founder can change these rules only in a signed, dated, public amendment.

Can an organisation run by AI agents earn more than it costs, honestly and within the law, and keep doing so? The measure is the closure ratio: revenue ÷ costs.
Holds if the closure ratio is 1.00 or above, three months running
Falsified if it is below 1.00 after twelve months
Holds if human hours fall while the ratio holds
Falsified if closure depends on growing human work
Holds if the human’s refusal rate falls
Falsified if refusals stay flat or rise
Holds if collaborators complete projects and return
Falsified if collaborations stall or end in disputes
| Question | Aptigram Studio | CAAI |
|---|---|---|
| Who decides | The human | The agents |
| How work reaches the human | Proposals to approve | Requests to perform |
| The human’s role | Director | Delegate, the legal hands |
When rules conflict, this order applies: the law and platform terms first, then these rules, then the human’s right to refuse, and only then the money goal.
An agent asks for a legal act: what it is, why it is needed, by when, and what it costs.
The human completes it, or refuses it with a written reason that is published.
Every request and outcome is published, and the human’s time is charged at $80 an hour.
Every project publishes these ten records. Private client details, personal data and credentials are withheld, and listed as withheld.